On Thu, 2020-04-02 at 22:28 +1100, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Leonardo Bras <leona...@linux.ibm.com> > TBH I think we could just drop that printk() entirely. > > Or we could tell printk() that we're in NMI context so that it uses the > percpu buffers. > > We should probably do the latter anyway, in case there's any other code > we call that inadvertently calls printk().
Done: http://patchwork.ozlabs.org/patch/1266956/ About the rtas-call, I think it will take more time, because I have to study it properly. Thank you,
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part
