Em Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 10:35:06AM +0100, Jiri Olsa escreveu: > On Mon, Mar 09, 2020 at 11:55:44AM +0530, Kajol Jain wrote: > > First patch of the patchset fix inconsistent results we are getting when > > we run multiple 24x7 events. > > > > Patchset adds json file metric support for the hv_24x7 socket/chip level > > events. "hv_24x7" pmu interface events needs system dependent parameter > > like socket/chip/core. For example, hv_24x7 chip level events needs > > specific chip-id to which the data is requested should be added as part > > of pmu events. > > > > So to enable JSON file support to "hv_24x7" interface, patchset expose > > total number of sockets and chips per-socket details in sysfs > > files (sockets, chips) under "/sys/devices/hv_24x7/interface/". > > > > To get sockets and number of chips per sockets, patchset adds a rtas call > > with token "PROCESSOR_MODULE_INFO" to get these details. Patchset also > > handles partition migration case to re-init these system depended > > parameters by adding proper calls in post_mobility_fixup() (mobility.c). > > > > Patch 6 & 8 of the patchset handles perf tool plumbing needed to replace > > the "?" character in the metric expression to proper value and hv_24x7 > > json metric file for different Socket/chip resources. > > > > Patch set also enable Hz/hz prinitg for --metric-only option to print > > metric data for bus frequency. > > > > Applied and tested all these patches cleanly on top of jiri's flex changes > > with the changes done by Kan Liang for "Support metric group constraint" > > patchset and made required changes. > > > > Changelog: > > v3 -> v4 > > - Made changes suggested by jiri. > > could you please mention them next time? ;-) > > > - Apply these patch on top of Kan liang changes. > > Arnaldo, could you please pull the expr flex changes and Kan's > metric group constraint changes? it's both prereq of this patchset
Both are now in my perf/core branch, will go upstream soon, should I go and pickup the perf tooling bits in this patchkit? - Arnaldo
