Gautham R Shenoy <e...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes: > On Fri, Feb 21, 2020 at 09:03:16AM -0600, Nathan Lynch wrote: >> Looks fine and correct as a cleanup, but asm/include/idle.h and >> idle_loop_prolog, idle_loop_epilog, strike me as too generic for >> pseries-specific code. > > Should it be prefixed with pseries , i.e pseries_idle_prolog() > and pseries_idle_epilog() ?
Yes that seems appropriate to me.
