On Mon, 2020-01-13 at 19:13 -0600, Timur Tabi wrote: > On 1/13/20 7:10 PM, Timur Tabi wrote: > > I would prefer that ev_byte_channel_send() is updated to access only > > 'count' bytes. If that means adding a memcpy to the > > ev_byte_channel_send() itself, then so be it. Trying to figure out how > > to stuff n bytes into 4 32- > > bit registers is probably not worth the effort. > > Looks like ev_byte_channel_receive() has the same bug, but in reverse.
It only has one user, which always passes in a 16-byte buffer. -Scott
