On Fri, Nov 29, 2019 at 01:55:14AM +0530, Bhupesh Sharma wrote: > Fix a simple typo in arm64/memory.rst > > Cc: Jonathan Corbet <cor...@lwn.net> > Cc: James Morse <james.mo...@arm.com> > Cc: Mark Rutland <mark.rutl...@arm.com> > Cc: Will Deacon <w...@kernel.org> > Cc: Steve Capper <steve.cap...@arm.com> > Cc: Catalin Marinas <catalin.mari...@arm.com> > Cc: Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheu...@linaro.org> > Cc: linux-...@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org > Cc: linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org > Signed-off-by: Bhupesh Sharma <bhsha...@redhat.com> > --- > Documentation/arm64/memory.rst | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/Documentation/arm64/memory.rst b/Documentation/arm64/memory.rst > index 02e02175e6f5..cf03b3290800 100644 > --- a/Documentation/arm64/memory.rst > +++ b/Documentation/arm64/memory.rst > @@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ this logic. > > As a single binary will need to support both 48-bit and 52-bit VA > spaces, the VMEMMAP must be sized large enough for 52-bit VAs and > -also must be sized large enought to accommodate a fixed PAGE_OFFSET. > +also must be sized large enough to accommodate a fixed PAGE_OFFSET. > > Most code in the kernel should not need to consider the VA_BITS, for > code that does need to know the VA size the variables are > --
Why is this a separate patch? -- Regards/Gruss, Boris. https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette