On 11/19/19 3:37 AM, Jan Kara wrote:
> On Tue 19-11-19 00:16:36, John Hubbard wrote:
>> @@ -2025,6 +2149,20 @@ static int __record_subpages(struct page *page,
>> unsigned long addr,
>> return nr;
>> }
>>
>> +static bool __pin_compound_head(struct page *head, int refs, unsigned int
>> flags)
>> +{
>
> I don't quite like the proliferation of names starting with __. I don't
> think there's a good reason for that, particularly in this case. Also 'pin'
> here is somewhat misleading as we already use term "pin" for the particular
> way of pinning the page. We could have grab_compound_head() or maybe
> nail_compound_head() :), but you're native speaker so you may come up with
> better word.
Yes, it is ugly naming, I'll change these as follows:
__pin_compound_head() --> grab_compound_head()
__record_subpages() --> record_subpages()
I loved the "nail_compound_head()" suggestion, it just seems very vivid, but
in the end, I figured I'd better keep it relatively drab and colorless. :)
>
>> + if (flags & FOLL_PIN) {
>> + if (unlikely(!try_pin_compound_head(head, refs)))
>> + return false;
>> + } else {
>> + head = try_get_compound_head(head, refs);
>> + if (!head)
>> + return false;
>> + }
>> +
>> + return true;
>> +}
>> +
>> static void put_compound_head(struct page *page, int refs)
>> {
>> /* Do a get_page() first, in case refs == page->_refcount */
>
> put_compound_head() needs similar treatment as undo_dev_pagemap(), doesn't
> it?
>
Yes, will fix that up.
>> @@ -968,7 +973,18 @@ struct page *follow_devmap_pmd(struct vm_area_struct
>> *vma, unsigned long addr,
>> if (!*pgmap)
>> return ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
>> page = pfn_to_page(pfn);
>> - get_page(page);
>> +
>> + if (flags & FOLL_GET)
>> + get_page(page);
>> + else if (flags & FOLL_PIN) {
>> + /*
>> + * try_pin_page() is not actually expected to fail here because
>> + * we hold the pmd lock so no one can unmap the pmd and free the
>> + * page that it points to.
>> + */
>> + if (unlikely(!try_pin_page(page)))
>> + page = ERR_PTR(-EFAULT);
>> + }
>
> This pattern is rather common. So maybe I'd add a helper grab_page(page,
> flags) doing
>
> if (flags & FOLL_GET)
> get_page(page);
> else if (flags & FOLL_PIN)
> return try_pin_page(page);
> return true;
>
OK.
> Otherwise the patch looks good to me now.
>
> Honza
Great! I thought I'd have a v7 out today, but fate decided to have me repair
my test machine instead. So, soon. ha. :)
thanks,
--
John Hubbard
NVIDIA
