Qais Yousef <qais.you...@arm.com> writes:
> The core device API performs extra housekeeping bits that are missing
> from directly calling cpu_up/down.
>
> See commit a6717c01ddc2 ("powerpc/rtas: use device model APIs and
> serialization during LPM") for an example description of what might go
> wrong.
>
> This also prepares to make cpu_up/down a private interface for anything
> but the cpu subsystem.
>
> Signed-off-by: Qais Yousef <qais.you...@arm.com>
> CC: Benjamin Herrenschmidt <b...@kernel.crashing.org>
> CC: Paul Mackerras <pau...@samba.org>
> CC: Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au>
> CC: Enrico Weigelt <i...@metux.net>
> CC: Ram Pai <linux...@us.ibm.com>
> CC: Nicholas Piggin <npig...@gmail.com>
> CC: Thiago Jung Bauermann <bauer...@linux.ibm.com>
> CC: Christophe Leroy <christophe.le...@c-s.fr>
> CC: Thomas Gleixner <t...@linutronix.de>
> CC: linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org
> CC: linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org
> ---
> arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c | 4 +++-
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
My initial though is "what about kdump", but that function is not called
during kdump, so there should be no issue with the extra locking leading
to deadlocks in a crash.
Acked-by: Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au>
I assume you haven't actually tested it?
cheers
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c
> b/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c
> index 04a7cba58eff..ebf8cc7acc4d 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/machine_kexec_64.c
> @@ -208,13 +208,15 @@ static void wake_offline_cpus(void)
> {
> int cpu = 0;
>
> + lock_device_hotplug();
> for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
> if (!cpu_online(cpu)) {
> printk(KERN_INFO "kexec: Waking offline cpu %d.\n",
> cpu);
> - WARN_ON(cpu_up(cpu));
> + WARN_ON(device_online(get_cpu_device(cpu)));
> }
> }
> + unlock_device_hotplug();
> }
>
> static void kexec_prepare_cpus(void)
> --
> 2.17.1
