On Apr 14, 2008, at 11:44 PM, Paul Mackerras wrote:
Kumar Gala writes:

global_dbcr0 needs to be a per cpu set of save areas instead of a single
global on all processors.

Looks reasonable.  At some point you might want to use a per-cpu
variable instead of an array in order to reduce cacheline bouncing.

Can you point me at an example of this. Do we do any asm access with per-cpu variables anywhere today?

Also, we switch to using DBCR0_IDM to determine if the user space app is
being debugged as its a more consistent way.  In the future we should
support features like hardware breakpoint and watchpoints which will
have DBCR0_IDM set but not necessarily DBCR0_IC (single step).

That should be OK.

Ok.  I'll put it my powerpc-next tree.

- k
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to