On (19/11/12 19:12), Sergey Senozhatsky wrote:
> On (19/11/12 09:35), Petr Mladek wrote:
> [..]
> > This is getting too complicated. It would introduce too many
> > hidden rules. While the explicitly passed loglevel parameter
> > is straightforward and clear.
>
> If loglevel is DEFAULT or NOTICE or INFO then we can overwrite it
> (either downgrade or upgrade). That's one rule, basically. Not too
> complicated, I guess.

Can be taken even a bit further than

        show_stack(NULL, NULL, LOGLEVEL_DEBUG);
or
        show_stack(NULL, NULL, LOGLEVEL_ERR);

For instance,

        spin_lock_irqsave(&rq->lock, flags);
        printk_emergency_enter(LOGLEVEL_SCHED);
                ...
                show_stack(...);
                printk();
                printk();
                ...
        spin_unlock_irqrestore(&rq->lock, flags);

or

        spin_lock_irqsave(&uart_port->lock, flags);
        printk_emergency_enter(LOGLEVEL_SCHED);
                ...
                printk();
                printk();
                ...

and so on.

        -ss

Reply via email to