> -----Original Message----- > From: Gustavo Pimentel <gustavo.pimen...@synopsys.com> > Sent: 2019年11月6日 17:40 > To: Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kis...@ti.com>; Andrew Murray > <andrew.mur...@arm.com>; Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei....@nxp.com>; > gustavo.pimen...@synopsys.com > Cc: bhelg...@google.com; robh...@kernel.org; mark.rutl...@arm.com; > shawn...@kernel.org; Leo Li <leoyang...@nxp.com>; > lorenzo.pieral...@arm.co; a...@arndb.de; gre...@linuxfoundation.org; M.h. > Lian <minghuan.l...@nxp.com>; Mingkai Hu <mingkai...@nxp.com>; Roy > Zang <roy.z...@nxp.com>; jingooh...@gmail.com; > linux-...@vger.kernel.org; devicet...@vger.kernel.org; > linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; > linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org > Subject: RE: [PATCH v2 07/10] PCI: layerscape: Modify the MSIX to the > doorbell way > > On Thu, Aug 29, 2019 at 6:13:18, Kishon Vijay Abraham I <kis...@ti.com> > wrote: > > Hi, this email slip away from my attention... > > > Gustavo, > > > > On 27/08/19 6:55 PM, Andrew Murray wrote: > > > On Sat, Aug 24, 2019 at 12:08:40AM +0000, Xiaowei Bao wrote: > > >> > > >> > > >>> -----Original Message----- > > >>> From: Andrew Murray <andrew.mur...@arm.com> > > >>> Sent: 2019年8月23日 21:58 > > >>> To: Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei....@nxp.com> > > >>> Cc: bhelg...@google.com; robh...@kernel.org; > mark.rutl...@arm.com; > > >>> shawn...@kernel.org; Leo Li <leoyang...@nxp.com>; kis...@ti.com; > > >>> lorenzo.pieral...@arm.co; a...@arndb.de; gre...@linuxfoundation.org; > M.h. > > >>> Lian <minghuan.l...@nxp.com>; Mingkai Hu <mingkai...@nxp.com>; > Roy > > >>> Zang <roy.z...@nxp.com>; jingooh...@gmail.com; > > >>> gustavo.pimen...@synopsys.com; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; > > >>> devicet...@vger.kernel.org; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; > > >>> linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; > > >>> linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org > > >>> Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 07/10] PCI: layerscape: Modify the MSIX to > > >>> the doorbell way > > >>> > > >>> On Thu, Aug 22, 2019 at 07:22:39PM +0800, Xiaowei Bao wrote: > > >>>> The layerscape platform use the doorbell way to trigger MSIX > > >>>> interrupt in EP mode. > > >>>> > > >>> > > >>> I have no problems with this patch, however... > > >>> > > >>> Are you able to add to this message a reason for why you are > > >>> making this change? Did dw_pcie_ep_raise_msix_irq not work when > > >>> func_no != 0? Or did it work yet dw_pcie_ep_raise_msix_irq_doorbell is > more efficient? > > >> > > >> The fact is that, this driver is verified in ls1046a platform of > > >> NXP before, and ls1046a don't support MSIX feature, so I set the > > >> msix_capable of pci_epc_features struct is false, but in other > > >> platform, e.g. ls1088a, it support the MSIX feature, I verified the MSIX > feature in ls1088a, it is not OK, so I changed to another way. Thanks. > > > > > > Right, so the existing pci-layerscape-ep.c driver never supported > > > MSIX yet it erroneously had a switch case statement to call > > > dw_pcie_ep_raise_msix_irq which would never get used. > > > > > > Now that we're adding a platform with MSIX support the existing > > > dw_pcie_ep_raise_msix_irq doesn't work (for this platform) so we are > > > adding a different method. > > > > Gustavo, can you confirm dw_pcie_ep_raise_msix_irq() works for > > designware as it didn't work for both me and Xiaowei? > > When I implemented the dw_pcie_ep_raise_msix_irq(), the implementation > was working quite fine on DesignWare solution. Otherwise, I wouldn't submit > it to the kernel. > From what I have seen and if I recall well, Xiaowei implementation was done > having PF's configurated on his solution, which is a configuration that I > don't > have in my solution, I believe this could be the missing piece that differs > between our 2 implementations. > > Since patch submission into the kernel related to msix feature on pcitest > tool, I > didn't touch or re-tested the msix feature by lack of time (other projects > requires my full attention for now). However is on my roadmap to came back > to add some other features on DesignWare eDMA driver and I can do at that > time some tests to see if the > dw_pcie_ep_raise_msix_irq_doorbell() is compatible or not with my solution. > If so, I can do some patch to simplify and use the > dw_pcie_ep_raise_msix_irq_doorbell() if it still works as expected like on > dw_pcie_ep_raise_msix_irq(). Agree? >
Thanks Gustavo, it looks well for me. Thanks Xiaowei > Gustavo > > > > > Thanks > > Kishon >
