In article <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> you write: > > > A changelog of "updates a bunch of stuff" is pretty much irrelevant in > > all situations I can think of. > > Ok, I hope I got everything: > > Changes to match new FPGA/HW functionality. > * Switched from 64M NOR/64M NAND to 4M NOR/256M NAND. > * Moved/resized partitions to match the flash changes. > * Fixup code added for Rev A boards to handle flash changes. > * Added DTM critical temperature. > * Added DTM fan error - currently disable in FPGA. > * Added POST information. > * Removed LED function, moved to new LED driver. > * Moved ad7414 to new style I2C initialization.
Each patch needs to be standalone. you need to add a header describing what the patch is intended to accomplish. Being more descriptive is better than less. Also, as Stephen said, make sure that the subject of each email containing a patch is descriptive and reasonably unique within the entire kernel. For example, instead of "WDT driver", as a minimum something like: "[POWERPC] warp: Add WDT driver". -Dale _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
