> -----Original Message----- > From: Ran Wang <ran.wan...@nxp.com> > Sent: Wednesday, October 23, 2019 4:53 AM > To: Rafael J. Wysocki <raf...@kernel.org> > Cc: Rafael J . Wysocki <r...@rjwysocki.net>; Rob Herring > <robh...@kernel.org>; Leo Li <leoyang...@nxp.com>; Mark Rutland > <mark.rutl...@arm.com>; Pavel Machek <pa...@ucw.cz>; Anson Huang > <anson.hu...@nxp.com>; Biwen Li <biwen...@nxp.com>; Len Brown > <len.br...@intel.com>; Greg Kroah-Hartman > <gre...@linuxfoundation.org>; linuxppc-dev <linuxppc- > d...@lists.ozlabs.org>; Linux ARM <linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org>; > devicet...@vger.kernel.org; Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux- > ker...@vger.kernel.org>; Linux PM <linux...@vger.kernel.org> > Subject: RE: [PATCH v9 1/3] PM: wakeup: Add routine to help fetch wakeup > source object. > > Hi Rafael, > > On Wednesday, October 23, 2019 17:07, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > > > > On Wed, Oct 23, 2019 at 10:24 AM Ran Wang <ran.wan...@nxp.com> > wrote: > > > > > > Some user might want to go through all registered wakeup sources and > > > doing things accordingly. For example, SoC PM driver might need to > > > do HW programming to prevent powering down specific IP which wakeup > > > source depending on. So add this API to help walk through all > > > registered wakeup source objects on that list and return them one by > one. > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Ran Wang <ran.wan...@nxp.com> > > > Tested-by: Leonard Crestez <leonard.cres...@nxp.com> > > > > OK, thanks for making all of the requested changes: > > Thanks for your patient direction :) > Actually Leo and me planed to have a f2f discussion with you about this patch > on LPC 2019 but unfortunately missed the opportunity finally (v6 review was > pending at time). > > > Reviewed-by: Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael.j.wyso...@intel.com>
Thanks for the review. > > > > and please feel free to push this through the appropriate arch/platform > tree. > > Yes, we will do this later. > > > Alternatively, please let me know if you want me to take this series, > > but then I need an ACK from the appropriate > > maintainer(s) on patch 3. > > Thanks again, I will wait Leo's comment on patch 3. I will do another review on patch 3 and apply the series through my soc/fsl tree. Regards, Leo