On Wed, Aug 28, 2019 at 11:34:09PM +1000, Michael Ellerman wrote: > Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de> writes: > > Michael, > > > > do oyu plan to pick this up? Otherwise I'd love to pick it up through > > the dma-mapping tree as that would avoid one trivial conflict with > > another pending patch. > > It conflicts a bit with the ioremap changes I already have in next. > > And it would be good for it to get some testing on my machines here. So > I guess I'd rather it went via the powerpc tree?
Sure, feel free to queue it up through the ppc tree. I am about to queue up a patch to move the dma_atomic_pool_init call to common code, so as linux-next / Linus fixup we'll have to eventually remove atomic_pool_init() again.
