On Fri, Aug 23, 2019 at 09:58:04PM +0000, Paul Burton wrote: > So I believe uncached & uncached accelerated are another case like that > described above - they're 2 different CCAs but the same "access type", > namely uncached. > > Section 4.9 then goes on to forbid mixing access types, but not CCAs. > > It would be nice if the precise mapping from CCA to access type was > provided, but I don't see that anywhere. I can check with the > architecture team to be sure, but to my knowledge we're fine to mix > access via kseg1 (ie. uncached) & mappings with CCA=7 (uncached > accelerated).
Ok. Looks like we can keep it then and I'll add a comment to the code with the above reference.
