Gautham R Shenoy <ego.l...@gmail.com> writes: > On Sat, Aug 3, 2019 at 1:03 AM Nathan Lynch <nath...@linux.ibm.com> wrote: >> >> rtas_cpu_state_change_mask() potentially operates on scores of cpus, >> so explicitly allow rescheduling in the loop body. >> > > Are we seeing softlockups/rcu stalls while running this ?
I have not seen a report yet, but since the loop is bound only by the number of processors in the LPAR I suspect it's only a matter of time. > Reviewed-by: Gautham R. Shenoy <e...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> Thanks!
