On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 01:45:35PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 1:32 PM Nathan Chancellor > <natechancel...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > > On Mon, Jul 29, 2019 at 01:25:41PM -0700, Nick Desaulniers wrote: > > > But I'm not sure how the inlined code generated would be affected. > > > > For the record: > > > > https://godbolt.org/z/z57VU7 > > > > This seems consistent with what Michael found so I don't think a revert > > is entirely unreasonable. > > Thanks for debugging/reporting/testing and the Godbolt link which > clearly shows that the codegen for out of line versions is no > different. The case I can't comment on is what happens when those > `static inline` functions get inlined (maybe the original patch > improves those cases?). > -- > Thanks, > ~Nick Desaulniers
I'll try to build with various versions of GCC and compare the disassembly of the one problematic location that I found and see what it looks like. Cheers, Nathan
