[ Cc'ing Tom Lendacky which I forgot to do earlier. Sorry about that. ]
Hello Christoph, Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de> writes: > Honestly I think this code should go away without any replacement. > There is no reason why we should have a special debug printk just > for one specific reason why there is a requirement for a large DMA > mask. Makes sense. I'll submit a v2 which just removes this code. -- Thiago Jung Bauermann IBM Linux Technology Center
