On 7/1/19 10:12 PM, Nathan Lynch wrote:
"Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.ku...@linux.ibm.com> writes:
I guess we should have here.
modified arch/powerpc/mm/numa.c
@@ -416,12 +416,11 @@ static int of_get_assoc_arrays(struct assoc_arrays
*aa)
static int of_drconf_to_nid_single(struct drmem_lmb *lmb)
{
struct assoc_arrays aa = { .arrays = NULL };
- /* is that correct? */
int default_nid = 0;
int nid = default_nid;
int rc, index;
- if (!numa_enabled)
+ if ((min_common_depth < 0) || !numa_enabled)
return NUMA_NO_NODE;
rc = of_get_assoc_arrays(&aa);
Nathan,
Can you check this?
Looks like it would do the right thing.
Just checking: do people still need numa=off? Seems like it's a
maintenance burden :-)
That is used in kdump kernel.
-aneesh
