Thanks for reviewing this patch Mpe. Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au> writes:
> "Oliver O'Halloran" <ooh...@gmail.com> writes: >> On Fri, Jun 28, 2019 at 1:39 PM Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au> wrote: >>> >>> Vaibhav Jain <vaib...@linux.ibm.com> writes: >>> > *snip* >>> >>> How can we be changing the meaning of HCALL numbers without breaking all >>> existing usages? >> >> The changed one being changed here were never used by linux or >> implemented by either hypervisor. > > OK. Please say so in the change log so that it's clear it's not a > behaviour change. I have respinned this patchset to v4 updating this patch's description mentioning the hcall opcodes that are removed. > >>> Where are these hypervisor calls documented? >> >> In an internal spec from one the phyp guys. I have been complaining >> about it not being open (or merged into PAPR at the very least), but >> it doesn't look like there's been any movement there. > > Please send a patch for Documentation/powerpc/ describing the API for > the hypercalls we're using. Sure will send a separate patch documenting this. > cheers > -- Vaibhav Jain <vaib...@linux.ibm.com> Linux Technology Center, IBM India Pvt. Ltd.
