On Tue, 25 Jun 2019 16:37:13 +0200 Christoph Hellwig <h...@lst.de> wrote:
> +static int gup_huge_pd(hugepd_t hugepd Naming nitlet: we have hugepd and we also have huge_pd. We have hugepte and we also have huge_pte. It make things a bit hard to remember and it would be nice to make it all consistent sometime. We're consistent with huge_pud and almost consistent with huge_pmd. To be fully consistent I guess we should make all of them have the underscore. Or not have it.
