On 06/13/2019 06:05 PM, Nathan Lynch wrote: > Nathan Lynch <nath...@linux.ibm.com> writes: > >> Tyrel Datwyler <tyr...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes: >> >>> Maybe we are ok with this behavior as I haven't dug deep enough into the >>> memory >>> subsystem here to really understand what the memory code is updating, but >>> it is >>> concerning that we are doing it in some cases, but not all. >> >> I hope I've made a good case above that the notifier does not do any >> useful work, and a counterpart for the v2 format isn't needed. Do you >> agree? >> >> If so, I'll send a patch later to remove the notifier altogether. In the >> near term I would still like this minimal fix to go in. > > Tyrel, ack? >
Sure, lets start with simple case to fix the crash. -Tyrel
