Hi Michael !
Thanks for the kind help.
On Tue, May 28, 2019 at 7:21 AM Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au> wrote:
>
> Mathieu Malaterre <ma...@debian.org> writes:
> > Hi there,
> >
> > Is there a way to dump more context (somewhere in of tree
> > flattening?). I cannot make sense of the following:
>
> Hmm. Not that I know of.
>
> Those don't look related to OF flattening/unflattening. That's just
> sysfs setup based on the unflattened device tree.
>
> The allocations are happening in safe_name() AFAICS.
>
> int __of_add_property_sysfs(struct device_node *np, struct property *pp)
> {
> ...
> pp->attr.attr.name = safe_name(&np->kobj, pp->name);
>
> And the free is in __of_sysfs_remove_bin_file():
>
> void __of_sysfs_remove_bin_file(struct device_node *np, struct property *prop)
> {
> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_SYSFS))
> return;
>
> sysfs_remove_bin_file(&np->kobj, &prop->attr);
> kfree(prop->attr.attr.name);
>
Right. That helped a lot !
> There is this check which could be failing leading to us not calling the
> free at all:
>
> void __of_remove_property_sysfs(struct device_node *np, struct property *prop)
> {
> /* at early boot, bail here and defer setup to of_init() */
> if (of_kset && of_node_is_attached(np))
> __of_sysfs_remove_bin_file(np, prop);
> }
>
>
> So maybe stick a printk() in there to see if you're hitting that
> condition, eg something like:
>
> if (of_kset && of_node_is_attached(np))
> __of_sysfs_remove_bin_file(np, prop);
> else
> printk("%s: leaking prop %s on node %pOF\n", __func__,
> prop->attr.attr.name, np);
>
If I understand correctly those are false positive. I was first
starting to consider using something like kmemleak_not_leak, but I
remember that I have been using kmemleak for a couple of years now.
Those reports starting to show up only recently.
Catalin, do you have an idea why on a non-SMP machine kmemleak reports
leaks from:
[...]
void __init of_core_init(void)
{
[...]
for_each_of_allnodes(np)
__of_attach_node_sysfs(np);
> cheers
>
> > kmemleak: 1157 new suspected memory leaks (see /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak)
> >
> > Where:
> >
> > # head -40 /sys/kernel/debug/kmemleak
> > unreferenced object 0xdf44d180 (size 8):
> > comm "swapper", pid 1, jiffies 4294892297 (age 4766.460s)
> > hex dump (first 8 bytes):
> > 62 61 73 65 00 00 00 00 base....
> > backtrace:
> > [<0ca59825>] kstrdup+0x4c/0xb8
> > [<c8a79377>] kobject_set_name_vargs+0x34/0xc8
> > [<661b4c86>] kobject_add+0x78/0x120
> > [<c1416f27>] __of_attach_node_sysfs+0xa0/0x14c
> > [<2a143d10>] of_core_init+0x90/0x114
> > [<a353d0e1>] driver_init+0x30/0x48
> > [<84ed01b1>] kernel_init_freeable+0xfc/0x3fc
> > [<dc60f815>] kernel_init+0x20/0x110
> > [<faa1c5b0>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x14/0x1c
> > unreferenced object 0xdf44d178 (size 8):
> > comm "swapper", pid 1, jiffies 4294892297 (age 4766.460s)
> > hex dump (first 8 bytes):
> > 6d 6f 64 65 6c 00 97 c8 model...
> > backtrace:
> > [<0ca59825>] kstrdup+0x4c/0xb8
> > [<0eeb0a3b>] __of_add_property_sysfs+0x88/0x12c
> > [<f6c64af0>] __of_attach_node_sysfs+0xcc/0x14c
> > [<2a143d10>] of_core_init+0x90/0x114
> > [<a353d0e1>] driver_init+0x30/0x48
> > [<84ed01b1>] kernel_init_freeable+0xfc/0x3fc
> > [<dc60f815>] kernel_init+0x20/0x110
> > [<faa1c5b0>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x14/0x1c
> > unreferenced object 0xdf4021e0 (size 16):
> > comm "swapper", pid 1, jiffies 4294892297 (age 4766.460s)
> > hex dump (first 16 bytes):
> > 63 6f 6d 70 61 74 69 62 6c 65 00 01 00 00 00 00 compatible......
> > backtrace:
> > [<0ca59825>] kstrdup+0x4c/0xb8
> > [<0eeb0a3b>] __of_add_property_sysfs+0x88/0x12c
> > [<f6c64af0>] __of_attach_node_sysfs+0xcc/0x14c
> > [<2a143d10>] of_core_init+0x90/0x114
> > [<a353d0e1>] driver_init+0x30/0x48
> > [<84ed01b1>] kernel_init_freeable+0xfc/0x3fc
> > [<dc60f815>] kernel_init+0x20/0x110
> > [<faa1c5b0>] ret_from_kernel_thread+0x14/0x1c
