On 20/05/19 2:35 PM, Anju T Sudhakar wrote:
Nest and core imc(In-memory Collection counters) assigns a particular
cpu as the designated target for counter data collection.
During system boot, the first online cpu in a chip gets assigned as
the designated cpu for that chip(for nest-imc) and the first online cpu
in a core gets assigned as the designated cpu for that core(for core-imc).

If the designated cpu goes offline, the next online cpu from the same
chip(for nest-imc)/core(for core-imc) is assigned as the next target,
and the event context is migrated to the target cpu.
Currently, cpumask_any_but() function is used to find the target cpu.
Though this function is expected to return a `random` cpu, this always
returns the next online cpu.

If all cpus in a chip/core is offlined in a sequential manner, starting
from the first cpu, the event migration has to happen for all the cpus
which goes offline. Since the migration process involves a grace period,
the total time taken to offline all the cpus will be significantly high.

Example:
In a system which has 2 sockets, with
NUMA node0 CPU(s):     0-87
NUMA node8 CPU(s):     88-175

Time taken to offline cpu 88-175:
real    2m56.099s
user    0m0.191s
sys     0m0.000s

Use cpumask_last() to choose the target cpu, when the designated cpu
goes online, so the migration will happen only when the last_cpu in the
mask goes offline. This way the time taken to offline all cpus in a
chip/core can be reduced.

With the patch,

Time taken  to offline cpu 88-175:
real    0m12.207s
user    0m0.171s
sys     0m0.000s

cpumask_last() is a better way to find the target cpu, since in most of the
cases cpuhotplug is performed in an increasing order(even in ppc64_cpu).

cpumask_any_but() can still be used to check the possibility of other
online cpus from the same chip/core if the last cpu in the mask goes
offline.

Reviewed-by: Madhavan Srinivasan <ma...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>

Also add "Fixes:" tag and this should go to stable right?

Signed-off-by: Anju T Sudhakar <a...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
---
  arch/powerpc/perf/imc-pmu.c | 14 ++++++++++++--
  1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/perf/imc-pmu.c b/arch/powerpc/perf/imc-pmu.c
index 31fa753..fbfd6e7 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/perf/imc-pmu.c
+++ b/arch/powerpc/perf/imc-pmu.c
@@ -366,7 +366,14 @@ static int ppc_nest_imc_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
         */
        nid = cpu_to_node(cpu);
        l_cpumask = cpumask_of_node(nid);
-       target = cpumask_any_but(l_cpumask, cpu);
+       target = cpumask_last(l_cpumask);
+
+       /*
+        * If this(target) is the last cpu in the cpumask for this chip,
+        * check for any possible online cpu in the chip.
+        */
+       if (unlikely(target == cpu))
+               target = cpumask_any_but(l_cpumask, cpu);

        /*
         * Update the cpumask with the target cpu and
@@ -671,7 +678,10 @@ static int ppc_core_imc_cpu_offline(unsigned int cpu)
                return 0;

        /* Find any online cpu in that core except the current "cpu" */
-       ncpu = cpumask_any_but(cpu_sibling_mask(cpu), cpu);
+       ncpu = cpumask_last(cpu_sibling_mask(cpu));
+
+       if (unlikely(ncpu == cpu))
+               ncpu = cpumask_any_but(cpu_sibling_mask(cpu), cpu);

        if (ncpu >= 0 && ncpu < nr_cpu_ids) {
                cpumask_set_cpu(ncpu, &core_imc_cpumask);

Reply via email to