On Mon, 20 May 2019 20:12:48 +0530 "Naveen N. Rao" <naveen.n....@linux.vnet.ibm.com> wrote:
> Thanks, that definitely helps make things clearer. A very small nit from > your first patch -- it would be good to also convert the calls to > ftrace_check_record() to use 'true' or 'false' for the 'update' field. Heh, I was so focused on the "enable" part, I did the "update" as a second thought, and forgot to update the callers. Thanks for pointing that out. > > I will test my series in more detail and post a v1. Great. -- Steve
