On Tue, May 7, 2019 at 11:38 AM David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com> wrote:
>
> Will come in handy when wanting to handle errors after
> arch_add_memory().
>
> Cc: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidef...@de.ibm.com>
> Cc: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carst...@de.ibm.com>
> Cc: Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org>
> Cc: Michal Hocko <mho...@suse.com>
> Cc: Mike Rapoport <r...@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
> Cc: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
> Cc: Vasily Gorbik <g...@linux.ibm.com>
> Cc: Oscar Salvador <osalva...@suse.com>
> Signed-off-by: David Hildenbrand <da...@redhat.com>
> ---
> arch/s390/mm/init.c | 13 +++++++------
> 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+), 6 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/mm/init.c b/arch/s390/mm/init.c
> index 31b1071315d7..1e0cbae69f12 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/mm/init.c
> +++ b/arch/s390/mm/init.c
> @@ -237,12 +237,13 @@ int arch_add_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size,
> void arch_remove_memory(int nid, u64 start, u64 size,
> struct vmem_altmap *altmap)
> {
> - /*
> - * There is no hardware or firmware interface which could trigger a
> - * hot memory remove on s390. So there is nothing that needs to be
> - * implemented.
> - */
> - BUG();
> + unsigned long start_pfn = start >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + unsigned long nr_pages = size >> PAGE_SHIFT;
> + struct zone *zone;
> +
> + zone = page_zone(pfn_to_page(start_pfn));
Does s390 actually support passing in an altmap? If 'yes', I think it
also needs the vmem_altmap_offset() fixup like x86-64:
/* With altmap the first mapped page is offset from @start */
if (altmap)
page += vmem_altmap_offset(altmap);
...but I suspect it does not support altmap since
arch/s390/mm/vmem.c::vmemmap_populate() does not arrange for 'struct
page' capacity to be allocated out of an altmap defined page pool.
I think it would be enough to disallow any arch_add_memory() on s390
where @altmap is non-NULL. At least until s390 gains ZONE_DEVICE
support and can enable the pmem use case.
