Haven't reviewed it in detail, just noticed something.
> @@ -614,6 +610,7 @@ static int __init hugetlb_init(void)
> {
> if (HPAGE_SHIFT == 0)
> return 0;
> + INIT_LIST_HEAD(&huge_boot_pages);
> return hugetlb_init_hstate(&global_hstate);
I don't think adding the INIT_LIST_HEAD here is correct. There can
be huge pages added by the __setup handlers before hugetlb_init
-Andi
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
