Segher Boessenkool wrote:
- Using another device node with a compatible value set to
"linear-ram" (or
something similar). This would support both volatile and non-volatile
devices, and a property could be added to specify if the device is
volatile
or not.
"memory-mapped-memory" perhaps :-)
Or, just "memory". Although that one might play havoc with some
I'd suggest "ram" and "rom" then. Luckily the device trees don't contain
binding for the real RAM chips yet. :-)
not-quite-correct main memory probing code.
You mean the there's parsers that search the "compatible" prop for
"memory" as well as "device_type" prop?
Segher
WBR, Sergei
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
