On Tue, Mar 25, 2008 at 12:28:05PM +1100, David Gibson wrote: > On Mon, Mar 24, 2008 at 12:36:41PM -0500, Scott Wood wrote: > > If you remove this, there'll be no way to indicate semantic errors other > > than die() (the NULL approaches are no good, since they inhibit recovery), > > which is suboptimal if the error is not immediately fatal. > > But everything is immediately fatal. When we have a *real* example of > something that's not, we can restore an error code.
Failed binary includes are not immediately fatal. -Scott _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
