On Thu, Mar 20, 2008 at 11:55 AM, John Linn <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Hi Grant, > > We could create a xilinx name, "xlnx,uart16550", and only use that > without the versions. >
I'm okay with this as long as you don't drop the versioned property also. ie. Each compatible node should contain 2 strings. The exact version and the generic string. My preference is something even more generic like "sparse16550" simply because there is precedence for such a thing before Xilinx came along (specifically, an 16550 device with reg shift and offset values). Since it is a common variant and If you document exactly what it means, then it should be okay to create a compatible property without the 'xlnx,' prefix. Cheers, g. -- Grant Likely, B.Sc., P.Eng. Secret Lab Technologies Ltd. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
