On Wed, 27 Feb 2019 14:28:43 +0530 "Aneesh Kumar K.V" <aneesh.ku...@linux.ibm.com> wrote:
> Andrew Morton <a...@linux-foundation.org> writes: > > > [patch 1/5]: unreviewed and has unaddressed comments from mpe. > > [patch 2/5]: ditto > > [patch 3/5]: ditto > > [patch 4/5]: seems ready > > [patch 5/5]: reviewed by mpe, but appears to need more work > > That was mostly variable naming preferences. I like the christmas > tree style not the inverted christmas tree. There is one detail about > commit message, which indicate the change may be required by other > architecture too. Was not sure whether that needed a commit message > update. > > I didn't send an updated series because after replying to most of them I > didn't find a strong request to get the required changes in. If you want > me update the series with this variable name ordering and commit message > update I can send a new series today. > OK, minor stuff. The patches have been in -next for a month, which is good but we really should get some review of the first three.
