* Michal Hocko <mho...@kernel.org> wrote:
> On Thu 24-01-19 11:10:50, Dave Hansen wrote:
> > On 1/24/19 6:17 AM, Michal Hocko wrote:
> > > and nr_cpus set to 4. The underlying reason is tha the device is bound
> > > to node 2 which doesn't have any memory and init_cpu_to_node only
> > > initializes memory-less nodes for possible cpus which nr_cpus restrics.
> > > This in turn means that proper zonelists are not allocated and the page
> > > allocator blows up.
> >
> > This looks OK to me.
> >
> > Could we add a few DEBUG_VM checks that *look* for these invalid
> > zonelists? Or, would our existing list debugging have caught this?
>
> Currently we simply blow up because those zonelists are NULL. I do not
> think we have a way to check whether an existing zonelist is actually
> _correct_ other thatn check it for NULL. But what would we do in the
> later case?
>
> > Basically, is this bug also a sign that we need better debugging around
> > this?
>
> My earlier patch had a debugging printk to display the zonelists and
> that might be worthwhile I guess. Basically something like this
>
> diff --git a/mm/page_alloc.c b/mm/page_alloc.c
> index 2e097f336126..c30d59f803fb 100644
> --- a/mm/page_alloc.c
> +++ b/mm/page_alloc.c
> @@ -5259,6 +5259,11 @@ static void build_zonelists(pg_data_t *pgdat)
>
> build_zonelists_in_node_order(pgdat, node_order, nr_nodes);
> build_thisnode_zonelists(pgdat);
> +
> + pr_info("node[%d] zonelist: ", pgdat->node_id);
> + for_each_zone_zonelist(zone, z,
> &pgdat->node_zonelists[ZONELIST_FALLBACK], MAX_NR_ZONES-1)
> + pr_cont("%d:%s ", zone_to_nid(zone), zone->name);
> + pr_cont("\n");
> }
Looks like this patch fell through the cracks - any update on this?
Thanks,
Ingo
