Chandan reported that fstests' generic/026 test hit a crash:
BUG: Unable to handle kernel data access at 0xc00000062ac40000
Faulting instruction address: 0xc000000000092240
Oops: Kernel access of bad area, sig: 11 [#1]
LE SMP NR_CPUS=2048 DEBUG_PAGEALLOC NUMA pSeries
CPU: 0 PID: 27828 Comm: chacl Not tainted
5.0.0-rc2-next-20190115-00001-g6de6dba64dda #1
NIP: c000000000092240 LR: c00000000066a55c CTR: 0000000000000000
REGS: c00000062c0c3430 TRAP: 0300 Not tainted
(5.0.0-rc2-next-20190115-00001-g6de6dba64dda)
MSR: 8000000002009033 <SF,VEC,EE,ME,IR,DR,RI,LE> CR: 44000842 XER: 20000000
CFAR: 00007fff7f3108ac DAR: c00000062ac40000 DSISR: 40000000 IRQMASK: 0
GPR00: 0000000000000000 c00000062c0c36c0 c0000000017f4c00 c00000000121a660
GPR04: c00000062ac3fff9 0000000000000004 0000000000000020 00000000275b19c4
GPR08: 000000000000000c 46494c4500000000 5347495f41434c5f c0000000026073a0
GPR12: 0000000000000000 c0000000027a0000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
GPR16: 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000 0000000000000000
GPR20: c00000062ea70020 c00000062c0c38d0 0000000000000002 0000000000000002
GPR24: c00000062ac3ffe8 00000000275b19c4 0000000000000001 c00000062ac30000
GPR28: c00000062c0c38d0 c00000062ac30050 c00000062ac30058 0000000000000000
NIP memcmp+0x120/0x690
LR xfs_attr3_leaf_lookup_int+0x53c/0x5b0
Call Trace:
xfs_attr3_leaf_lookup_int+0x78/0x5b0 (unreliable)
xfs_da3_node_lookup_int+0x32c/0x5a0
xfs_attr_node_addname+0x170/0x6b0
xfs_attr_set+0x2ac/0x340
__xfs_set_acl+0xf0/0x230
xfs_set_acl+0xd0/0x160
set_posix_acl+0xc0/0x130
posix_acl_xattr_set+0x68/0x110
__vfs_setxattr+0xa4/0x110
__vfs_setxattr_noperm+0xac/0x240
vfs_setxattr+0x128/0x130
setxattr+0x248/0x600
path_setxattr+0x108/0x120
sys_setxattr+0x28/0x40
system_call+0x5c/0x70
Instruction dump:
7d201c28 7d402428 7c295040 38630008 38840008 408201f0 4200ffe8 2c050000
4182ff6c 20c50008 54c61838 7d201c28 <7d402428> 7d293436 7d4a3436 7c295040
The instruction dump decodes as:
subfic r6,r5,8
rlwinm r6,r6,3,0,28
ldbrx r9,0,r3
ldbrx r10,0,r4 <-
Which shows us doing an 8 byte load from c00000062ac3fff9, which
crosses the page boundary at c00000062ac40000 and faults.
It's not OK for memcmp to read past the end of the source or
destination buffers.
The bug is in the code at the .Lcmp_rest_lt8bytes label. To fix it
test if we have at least 4 bytes to compare and if so do a 4 byte load
and compare. Otherwise, and/or if we have anything left, jump to the
existing code that does byte at a time comparison.
Reported-by: Chandan Rajendra <chan...@linux.ibm.com>
Tested-by: Chandan Rajendra <chan...@linux.ibm.com>
Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au>
---
v2: Use cmpdi not cmpwi as pointed out by Nick. It's a 64-bit reg so
it's clearer to use a 64-bit compare, even if we know the value is
less than 8.
arch/powerpc/lib/memcmp_64.S | 33 +++++++++++++++++++++------------
1 file changed, 21 insertions(+), 12 deletions(-)
diff --git a/arch/powerpc/lib/memcmp_64.S b/arch/powerpc/lib/memcmp_64.S
index 844d8e774492..ce4d6ca3a401 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/lib/memcmp_64.S
+++ b/arch/powerpc/lib/memcmp_64.S
@@ -215,20 +215,29 @@ _GLOBAL_TOC(memcmp)
beq .Lzero
.Lcmp_rest_lt8bytes:
- /* Here we have only less than 8 bytes to compare with. at least s1
- * Address is aligned with 8 bytes.
- * The next double words are load and shift right with appropriate
- * bits.
+ /*
+ * Here we have less than 8 bytes left to compare with. We mustn't read
+ * past the end of either source or dest.
*/
- subfic r6,r5,8
- slwi r6,r6,3
- LD rA,0,r3
- LD rB,0,r4
- srd rA,rA,r6
- srd rB,rB,r6
- cmpld cr0,rA,rB
+
+ /* If we have less than 4 bytes, just do byte at a time */
+ cmpdi cr1, r5, 4
+ blt cr1, .Lshort
+
+ /* Compare 4 bytes */
+ LW rA,0,r3
+ LW rB,0,r4
+ cmplw cr0,rA,rB
bne cr0,.LcmpAB_lightweight
- b .Lzero
+
+ /* If we had exactly 4 bytes left, we're done now */
+ beq cr1, .Lzero
+
+ /* Otherwise do what ever's left a byte at a time */
+ subi r5, r5, 4
+ addi r3, r3, 4
+ addi r4, r4, 4
+ b .Lshort
.Lnon_zero:
mr r3,rC
--
2.20.1
