On 1/31/19 4:21 PM, Tyrel Datwyler wrote:
> On 01/31/2019 01:53 PM, Michael Bringmann wrote:
>> On 1/30/19 11:38 PM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
>>> Michael Bringmann <m...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes:
>>>> This patch is to check for cede'ed CPUs during LPM. Some extreme
>>>> tests encountered a problem ehere Linux has put some threads to
>>>> sleep (possibly to save energy or something), LPM was attempted,
>>>> and the Linux kernel didn't awaken the sleeping threads, but issued
>>>> the H_JOIN for the active threads. Since the sleeping threads
>>>> are not awake, they can not issue the expected H_JOIN, and the
>>>> partition would never suspend. This patch wakes the sleeping
>>>> threads back up.
>>>
>>> I'm don't think this is the right solution.
>>>
>>> Just after your for loop we do an on_each_cpu() call, which sends an IPI
>>> to every CPU, and that should wake all CPUs up from CEDE.
>>>
>>> If that's not happening then there is a bug somewhere, and we need to
>>> work out where.
>>
>> Let me explain the scenario of the LPM case that Pete Heyrman found, and
>> that Nathan F. was working upon, previously.
>>
>> In the scenario, the partition has 5 dedicated processors each with 8 threads
>> running.
>
> Do we CEDE processors when running dedicated? I thought H_CEDE was part of the
> Shared Processor LPAR option.
>
>>
>> From the PHYP data we can see that on VP 0, threads 3, 4, 5, 6 and 7 issued
>> a H_CEDE requesting to save energy by putting the requesting thread into
>> sleep mode. In this state, the thread will only be awakened by H_PROD from
>> another running thread or from an external user action (power off, reboot
>> and such). Timers and external interrupts are disabled in this mode.
>
> Not according to PAPR. A CEDE'd processor should awaken if signaled by
> external
> interrupt such as decrementer or IPI as well.
Checking these points with Pete H.
Thanks.
>
> -Tyrel
>
>>
>> About 3 seconds later, as part of the LPM operation, the other 35 threads
>> have all issued a H_JOIN request. Join is part of the LPM process where
>> the threads suspend themselves as part of the LPM operation so the partition
>> can be migrated to the target server.
>>
>> So, the current state is the the OS has suspended the execution of all the
>> threads in the partition without successfully suspending all threads as part
>> of LPM.
>>
>> Net, OS has an issue where they suspended every processor thread so nothing
>> can run.
>>
>> This appears to be slightly different than the previous LPM stalls we have
>> seen where the migration stalls because of cpus being taken offline and not
>> making the H_JOIN call.
>>
>> In this scenario we appear to have CPUs that have done an H_CEDE prior to
>> the LPM. For these CPUs we would need to do a H_PROD to wake them back up
>> so they can do a H_JOIN and allow the LPM to continue.
>>
>> The problem is that Linux has some threads that they put to sleep (probably
>> to save energy or something), LPM was attempted, Linux didn't awaken the
>> sleeping threads but issued the H_JOIN for the active threads. Since the
>> sleeping threads don't issue the H_JOIN the partition will never suspend.
>>
>> I am checking again with Pete regarding your concerns.
>>
>> Thanks.
>>
>>>
>>>
>>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/plpar_wrappers.h
>>>> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/plpar_wrappers.h
>>>> index cff5a41..8292eff 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/plpar_wrappers.h
>>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/plpar_wrappers.h
>>>> @@ -26,10 +26,8 @@ static inline void set_cede_latency_hint(u8
>>>> latency_hint)
>>>> get_lppaca()->cede_latency_hint = latency_hint;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> -static inline long cede_processor(void)
>>>> -{
>>>> - return plpar_hcall_norets(H_CEDE);
>>>> -}
>>>> +int cpu_is_ceded(int cpu);
>>>> +long cede_processor(void);
>>>>
>>>> static inline long extended_cede_processor(unsigned long latency_hint)
>>>> {
>>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c
>>>> index de35bd8f..fea3d21 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/kernel/rtas.c
>>>> @@ -44,6 +44,7 @@
>>>> #include <asm/time.h>
>>>> #include <asm/mmu.h>
>>>> #include <asm/topology.h>
>>>> +#include <asm/plpar_wrappers.h>
>>>>
>>>> /* This is here deliberately so it's only used in this file */
>>>> void enter_rtas(unsigned long);
>>>> @@ -942,7 +943,7 @@ int rtas_ibm_suspend_me(u64 handle)
>>>> struct rtas_suspend_me_data data;
>>>> DECLARE_COMPLETION_ONSTACK(done);
>>>> cpumask_var_t offline_mask;
>>>> - int cpuret;
>>>> + int cpuret, cpu;
>>>>
>>>> if (!rtas_service_present("ibm,suspend-me"))
>>>> return -ENOSYS;
>>>> @@ -991,6 +992,11 @@ int rtas_ibm_suspend_me(u64 handle)
>>>> goto out_hotplug_enable;
>>>> }
>>>>
>>>> + for_each_present_cpu(cpu) {
>>>> + if (cpu_is_ceded(cpu))
>>>> + plpar_hcall_norets(H_PROD,
>>>> get_hard_smp_processor_id(cpu));
>>>> + }
>>>
>>> There's a race condition here, there's nothing to prevent the CPUs you
>>> just PROD'ed from going back into CEDE before you do the on_each_cpu()
>>> call below>
>>>> /* Call function on all CPUs. One of us will make the
>>>> * rtas call
>>>> */
>>>> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c
>>>> b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c
>>>> index 41f62ca2..48ae6d4 100644
>>>> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c
>>>> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/setup.c
>>>> @@ -331,6 +331,24 @@ static int alloc_dispatch_log_kmem_cache(void)
>>>> }
>>>> machine_early_initcall(pseries, alloc_dispatch_log_kmem_cache);
>>>>
>>>> +static DEFINE_PER_CPU(int, cpu_ceded);
>>>> +
>>>> +int cpu_is_ceded(int cpu)
>>>> +{
>>>> + return per_cpu(cpu_ceded, cpu);
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> +long cede_processor(void)
>>>> +{
>>>> + long rc;
>>>> +
>>>> + per_cpu(cpu_ceded, raw_smp_processor_id()) = 1;
>>>
>>> And there's also a race condition here. From the other CPU's perspective
>>> the store to cpu_ceded is not necessarily ordered vs the hcall below.
>>> Which means the other CPU can see cpu_ceded = 0, and therefore not prod
>>> us, but this CPU has already called H_CEDE.
>>>
>>>> + rc = plpar_hcall_norets(H_CEDE);
>>>> + per_cpu(cpu_ceded, raw_smp_processor_id()) = 0;
>>>> +
>>>> + return rc;
>>>> +}
>>>> +
>>>> static void pseries_lpar_idle(void)
>>>> {
>>>> /*
>>>
>>> cheers
>>>
>>>
>>
>
>
--
Michael W. Bringmann
Linux Technology Center
IBM Corporation
Tie-Line 363-5196
External: (512) 286-5196
Cell: (512) 466-0650
m...@linux.vnet.ibm.com
