Le 12/01/2019 à 13:12, Matthew Wilcox a écrit :
On Sat, Jan 12, 2019 at 03:56:38PM +0530, Anshuman Khandual wrote:
All architectures have been defining their own PGALLOC_GFP as (GFP_KERNEL |
__GFP_ZERO) and using it for allocating page table pages.
Except that's not true.
+++ b/arch/x86/mm/pgtable.c
@@ -13,19 +13,17 @@ phys_addr_t physical_mask __ro_after_init = (1ULL <<
__PHYSICAL_MASK_SHIFT) - 1;
EXPORT_SYMBOL(physical_mask);
#endif
-#define PGALLOC_GFP (GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT | __GFP_ZERO)
-
#ifdef CONFIG_HIGHPTE
...
pte_t *pte_alloc_one_kernel(struct mm_struct *mm)
{
- return (pte_t *)__get_free_page(PGALLOC_GFP & ~__GFP_ACCOUNT);
+ return (pte_t *)__get_free_page(GFP_PGTABLE & ~__GFP_ACCOUNT);
}
As far as I can see,
#define GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT (GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ACCOUNT)
So what's the difference between:
(GFP_KERNEL_ACCOUNT | __GFP_ZERO) & ~__GFP_ACCOUNT
and
(GFP_KERNEL | __GFP_ZERO) & ~__GFP_ACCOUNT
Christophe
I think x86 was the only odd one out here, but you'll need to try again ...
