On Thu, Jan 10, 2019 at 05:24:35PM +0100, Arnd Bergmann wrote:
> Most architectures define system call numbers for the rseq and pkey system
> calls, even when they don't support the features, and perhaps never will.
> 
> Only a few architectures are missing these, so just define them anyway
> for consistency. If we decide to add them later to one of these, the
> system call numbers won't get out of sync then.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Arnd Bergmann <a...@arndb.de>
> diff --git a/arch/s390/include/asm/unistd.h b/arch/s390/include/asm/unistd.h
> index a1fbf15d53aa..ed08f114ee91 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/include/asm/unistd.h
> +++ b/arch/s390/include/asm/unistd.h
> @@ -11,9 +11,6 @@
>  #include <asm/unistd_nr.h>
> 
>  #define __IGNORE_time
> -#define __IGNORE_pkey_mprotect
> -#define __IGNORE_pkey_alloc
> -#define __IGNORE_pkey_free
> 
>  #define __ARCH_WANT_NEW_STAT
>  #define __ARCH_WANT_OLD_READDIR
> diff --git a/arch/s390/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl 
> b/arch/s390/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> index 428cf512a757..f84ea364a302 100644
> --- a/arch/s390/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> +++ b/arch/s390/kernel/syscalls/syscall.tbl
> @@ -391,6 +391,9 @@
>  381  common  kexec_file_load         sys_kexec_file_load             
> compat_sys_kexec_file_load
>  382  common  io_pgetevents           sys_io_pgetevents               
> compat_sys_io_pgetevents
>  383  common  rseq                    sys_rseq                        
> compat_sys_rseq
> +384  common  pkey_alloc              sys_pkey_alloc                  
> sys_pkey_alloc
> +385  common  pkey_free               sys_pkey_free                   
> sys_pkey_free
> +386  common  pkey_mprotect           sys_pkey_mprotect               
> sys_pkey_mprotect

Since you only need/want the system call numbers, could you please
change these lines to:

> +384  common  pkey_alloc              -                               -
> +385  common  pkey_free               -                               -
> +386  common  pkey_mprotect           -                               -

Otherwise it _looks_ like we would need compat wrappers here as well,
even though all of them would just jump to sys_ni_syscall() in this
case. Making this explicit seems to better.

Reply via email to