On 12/16, Dmitry V. Levin wrote:
>
> long do_syscall_trace_enter(struct pt_regs *regs)
> {
> + u32 cached_flags;
> +
> user_exit();
>
> - if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_EMU)) {
> - /*
> - * A nonzero return code from tracehook_report_syscall_entry()
> - * tells us to prevent the syscall execution, but we are not
> - * going to execute it anyway.
> - *
> - * Returning -1 will skip the syscall execution. We want to
> - * avoid clobbering any register also, thus, not 'gotoing'
> - * skip label.
> - */
> - if (tracehook_report_syscall_entry(regs))
> - ;
> - return -1;
> - }
> + cached_flags = READ_ONCE(current_thread_info()->flags) &
> + (_TIF_SYSCALL_EMU | _TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE);
>
> - /*
> - * The tracer may decide to abort the syscall, if so tracehook
> - * will return !0. Note that the tracer may also just change
> - * regs->gpr[0] to an invalid syscall number, that is handled
> - * below on the exit path.
> - */
> - if (test_thread_flag(TIF_SYSCALL_TRACE) &&
> - tracehook_report_syscall_entry(regs))
> - goto skip;
> + if (cached_flags) {
> + int rc = tracehook_report_syscall_entry(regs);
> +
> + if (unlikely(cached_flags & _TIF_SYSCALL_EMU)) {
> + /*
> + * A nonzero return code from
> + * tracehook_report_syscall_entry() tells us
> + * to prevent the syscall execution, but
> + * we are not going to execute it anyway.
> + *
> + * Returning -1 will skip the syscall execution.
> + * We want to avoid clobbering any register also,
> + * thus, not 'gotoing' skip label.
> + */
> + return -1;
> + }
> +
> + if (rc) {
> + /*
> + * The tracer decided to abort the syscall.
> + * Note that the tracer may also just change
> + * regs->gpr[0] to an invalid syscall number,
> + * that is handled below on the exit path.
> + */
> + goto skip;
> + }
> + }
Looks good to me,
Oleg.
