On Mon, Mar 10, 2008 at 10:59:43AM +0100, Roel Kluin wrote: > > The & 0xff here is bogus anyway; temp is only ever used as an u8, > > so just declare it as that, or do proper overflow/underflow checking > > on it. The patch will need testing on hardware too, since it changes > > behaviour (it should be a bugfix, but who knows). > > Maybe someone can test this?
I did. No regressions observed and it fixes that bug as well. Sorry I didn't catch it earlier... :/ Acked-by: Darrick J. Wong <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> --D _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
