On Fri, Nov 23, 2018 at 04:52:49PM +1100, Alexey Kardashevskiy wrote:
> The powernv PCI code stores NPU data in the pnv_phb struct. The latter
> is referenced by pci_controller::private_data. We are going to have NPU2
> support in the pseries platform as well but it does not store any
> private_data in in the pci_controller struct; and even if it did,
> it would be a different data structure.
>
> This makes npu a pointer and stores it one level higher in
> the pci_controller struct.
>
> Signed-off-by: Alexey Kardashevskiy <a...@ozlabs.ru>
> ---
> Changes:
> v4:
> * changed subj from "powerpc/powernv: Detach npu struct from pnv_phb"
> * got rid of global list of npus - store them now in pci_controller
> * got rid of npdev_to_npu() helper
> ---
> arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h | 1 +
> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h | 16 -----
> arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/npu-dma.c | 81 ++++++++++++++++++------
> 3 files changed, 64 insertions(+), 34 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
> b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
> index 94d4490..aee4fcc 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h
> @@ -129,6 +129,7 @@ struct pci_controller {
> #endif /* CONFIG_PPC64 */
>
> void *private_data;
> + struct npu *npu;
> };
>
> /* These are used for config access before all the PCI probing
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h
> b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h
> index 2131373..f2d50974 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/pci.h
> @@ -8,9 +8,6 @@
>
> struct pci_dn;
>
> -/* Maximum possible number of ATSD MMIO registers per NPU */
> -#define NV_NMMU_ATSD_REGS 8
> -
> enum pnv_phb_type {
> PNV_PHB_IODA1 = 0,
> PNV_PHB_IODA2 = 1,
> @@ -176,19 +173,6 @@ struct pnv_phb {
> unsigned int diag_data_size;
> u8 *diag_data;
>
> - /* Nvlink2 data */
> - struct npu {
> - int index;
> - __be64 *mmio_atsd_regs[NV_NMMU_ATSD_REGS];
> - unsigned int mmio_atsd_count;
> -
> - /* Bitmask for MMIO register usage */
> - unsigned long mmio_atsd_usage;
> -
> - /* Do we need to explicitly flush the nest mmu? */
> - bool nmmu_flush;
> - } npu;
> -
> int p2p_target_count;
> };
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/npu-dma.c
> b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/npu-dma.c
> index 91d488f..7dd5c0e5 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/npu-dma.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/powernv/npu-dma.c
> @@ -327,6 +327,25 @@ struct pnv_ioda_pe *pnv_pci_npu_setup_iommu(struct
> pnv_ioda_pe *npe)
> return gpe;
> }
>
> +/*
> + * NPU2 ATS
> + */
> +/* Maximum possible number of ATSD MMIO registers per NPU */
> +#define NV_NMMU_ATSD_REGS 8
> +
> +/* An NPU descriptor, valid for POWER9 only */
> +struct npu {
> + int index;
> + __be64 *mmio_atsd_regs[NV_NMMU_ATSD_REGS];
> + unsigned int mmio_atsd_count;
> +
> + /* Bitmask for MMIO register usage */
> + unsigned long mmio_atsd_usage;
> +
> + /* Do we need to explicitly flush the nest mmu? */
> + bool nmmu_flush;
> +};
> +
> /* Maximum number of nvlinks per npu */
> #define NV_MAX_LINKS 6
>
> @@ -478,7 +497,6 @@ static void acquire_atsd_reg(struct npu_context
> *npu_context,
> int i, j;
> struct npu *npu;
> struct pci_dev *npdev;
> - struct pnv_phb *nphb;
>
> for (i = 0; i <= max_npu2_index; i++) {
> mmio_atsd_reg[i].reg = -1;
> @@ -493,8 +511,10 @@ static void acquire_atsd_reg(struct npu_context
> *npu_context,
> if (!npdev)
> continue;
>
> - nphb = pci_bus_to_host(npdev->bus)->private_data;
> - npu = &nphb->npu;
> + npu = pci_bus_to_host(npdev->bus)->npu;
> + if (!npu)
> + continue;
This patch changes a bunch of places that used to unconditionally
locate an NPU now have a failure path.
Given that this used to always have an NPU, doesn't that mean that if
the NPU is not present something has already gone wrong, and we should
WARN_ON() or something?
> mmio_atsd_reg[i].npu = npu;
> mmio_atsd_reg[i].reg = get_mmio_atsd_reg(npu);
> while (mmio_atsd_reg[i].reg < 0) {
> @@ -662,6 +682,7 @@ struct npu_context *pnv_npu2_init_context(struct pci_dev
> *gpdev,
> struct pnv_phb *nphb;
> struct npu *npu;
> struct npu_context *npu_context;
> + struct pci_controller *hose;
>
> /*
> * At present we don't support GPUs connected to multiple NPUs and I'm
> @@ -689,8 +710,11 @@ struct npu_context *pnv_npu2_init_context(struct pci_dev
> *gpdev,
> return ERR_PTR(-EINVAL);
> }
>
> - nphb = pci_bus_to_host(npdev->bus)->private_data;
> - npu = &nphb->npu;
> + hose = pci_bus_to_host(npdev->bus);
> + nphb = hose->private_data;
> + npu = hose->npu;
> + if (!npu)
> + return ERR_PTR(-ENODEV);
>
> /*
> * Setup the NPU context table for a particular GPU. These need to be
> @@ -764,7 +788,7 @@ struct npu_context *pnv_npu2_init_context(struct pci_dev
> *gpdev,
> */
> WRITE_ONCE(npu_context->npdev[npu->index][nvlink_index], npdev);
>
> - if (!nphb->npu.nmmu_flush) {
> + if (!npu->nmmu_flush) {
> /*
> * If we're not explicitly flushing ourselves we need to mark
> * the thread for global flushes
> @@ -802,6 +826,7 @@ void pnv_npu2_destroy_context(struct npu_context
> *npu_context,
> struct pci_dev *npdev = pnv_pci_get_npu_dev(gpdev, 0);
> struct device_node *nvlink_dn;
> u32 nvlink_index;
> + struct pci_controller *hose;
>
> if (WARN_ON(!npdev))
> return;
> @@ -809,8 +834,11 @@ void pnv_npu2_destroy_context(struct npu_context
> *npu_context,
> if (!firmware_has_feature(FW_FEATURE_OPAL))
> return;
>
> - nphb = pci_bus_to_host(npdev->bus)->private_data;
> - npu = &nphb->npu;
> + hose = pci_bus_to_host(npdev->bus);
> + nphb = hose->private_data;
> + npu = hose->npu;
> + if (!npu)
> + return;
> nvlink_dn = of_parse_phandle(npdev->dev.of_node, "ibm,nvlink", 0);
> if (WARN_ON(of_property_read_u32(nvlink_dn, "ibm,npu-link-index",
> &nvlink_index)))
> @@ -888,9 +916,15 @@ int pnv_npu2_init(struct pnv_phb *phb)
> struct pci_dev *gpdev;
> static int npu_index;
> uint64_t rc = 0;
> + struct pci_controller *hose = phb->hose;
> + struct npu *npu;
> + int ret;
>
> - phb->npu.nmmu_flush =
> - of_property_read_bool(phb->hose->dn, "ibm,nmmu-flush");
> + npu = kzalloc(sizeof(*npu), GFP_KERNEL);
> + if (!npu)
> + return -ENOMEM;
> +
> + npu->nmmu_flush = of_property_read_bool(hose->dn, "ibm,nmmu-flush");
> for_each_child_of_node(phb->hose->dn, dn) {
> gpdev = pnv_pci_get_gpu_dev(get_pci_dev(dn));
> if (gpdev) {
> @@ -904,18 +938,29 @@ int pnv_npu2_init(struct pnv_phb *phb)
> }
> }
>
> - for (i = 0; !of_property_read_u64_index(phb->hose->dn, "ibm,mmio-atsd",
> + for (i = 0; !of_property_read_u64_index(hose->dn, "ibm,mmio-atsd",
> i, &mmio_atsd); i++)
> - phb->npu.mmio_atsd_regs[i] = ioremap(mmio_atsd, 32);
> + npu->mmio_atsd_regs[i] = ioremap(mmio_atsd, 32);
>
> - pr_info("NPU%lld: Found %d MMIO ATSD registers", phb->opal_id, i);
> - phb->npu.mmio_atsd_count = i;
> - phb->npu.mmio_atsd_usage = 0;
> + pr_info("NPU%d: Found %d MMIO ATSD registers", hose->global_number, i);
> + npu->mmio_atsd_count = i;
> + npu->mmio_atsd_usage = 0;
> npu_index++;
> - if (WARN_ON(npu_index >= NV_MAX_NPUS))
> - return -ENOSPC;
> + if (WARN_ON(npu_index >= NV_MAX_NPUS)) {
> + ret = -ENOSPC;
> + goto fail_exit;
> + }
> max_npu2_index = npu_index;
> - phb->npu.index = npu_index;
> + npu->index = npu_index;
> + hose->npu = npu;
>
> return 0;
> +
> +fail_exit:
> + for (i = 0; i < npu->mmio_atsd_count; ++i)
> + iounmap(npu->mmio_atsd_regs[i]);
> +
> + kfree(npu);
> +
> + return ret;
> }
--
David Gibson | I'll have my music baroque, and my code
david AT gibson.dropbear.id.au | minimalist, thank you. NOT _the_ _other_
| _way_ _around_!
http://www.ozlabs.org/~dgibson
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
