* Dave Hansen:

> On 11/27/18 3:57 AM, Florian Weimer wrote:
>> I would have expected something that translates PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE |
>> PKEY_DISABLE_READ into PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS, and also accepts
>> PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS | PKEY_DISABLE_READ, for consistency with POWER.
>> 
>> (My understanding is that PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS does not disable all
>> access, but produces execute-only memory.)
>
> Correct, it disables all data access, but not execution.

So I would expect something like this (completely untested, I did not
even compile this):

diff --git a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h
index 20ebf153c871..bed23f9e8336 100644
--- a/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h
+++ b/arch/powerpc/include/asm/pkeys.h
@@ -199,6 +199,11 @@ static inline bool arch_pkeys_enabled(void)
        return !static_branch_likely(&pkey_disabled);
 }
 
+static inline bool arch_pkey_access_rights_valid(unsigned long rights)
+{
+       return (rights & ~(unsigned long)PKEY_ACCESS_MASK) == 0;
+}
+
 extern void pkey_mm_init(struct mm_struct *mm);
 extern bool arch_supports_pkeys(int cap);
 extern unsigned int arch_usable_pkeys(void);
diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/pkeys.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/pkeys.h
index 19b137f1b3be..e3e1d5a316e8 100644
--- a/arch/x86/include/asm/pkeys.h
+++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/pkeys.h
@@ -14,6 +14,17 @@ static inline bool arch_pkeys_enabled(void)
        return boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_OSPKE);
 }
 
+static inline bool arch_pkey_access_rights_valid(unsigned long rights)
+{
+       if (rights & ~(unsigned long)PKEY_ACCESS_MASK)
+               return false;
+       if (rights & PKEY_DISABLE_READ) {
+               /* x86 can only disable read access along with write access. */
+               return rights & (PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE | PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS);
+       }
+       return true;
+}
+
 /*
  * Try to dedicate one of the protection keys to be used as an
  * execute-only protection key.
diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
index 87a57b7642d3..b9b78145017f 100644
--- a/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
+++ b/arch/x86/kernel/fpu/xstate.c
@@ -928,7 +928,13 @@ int arch_set_user_pkey_access(struct task_struct *tsk, int 
pkey,
                return -EINVAL;
 
        /* Set the bits we need in PKRU:  */
-       if (init_val & PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS)
+       if (init_val & (PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS | PKEY_DISABLE_READ))
+               /*
+                * arch_pkey_access_rights_valid checked that
+                * PKEY_DISABLE_READ is actually representable on x86
+                * (that is, it comes with PKEY_DISABLE_ACCESS or
+                * PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE).
+                */
                new_pkru_bits |= PKRU_AD_BIT;
        if (init_val & PKEY_DISABLE_WRITE)
                new_pkru_bits |= PKRU_WD_BIT;
diff --git a/include/linux/pkeys.h b/include/linux/pkeys.h
index 2955ba976048..2c330fabbe55 100644
--- a/include/linux/pkeys.h
+++ b/include/linux/pkeys.h
@@ -48,6 +48,11 @@ static inline void copy_init_pkru_to_fpregs(void)
 {
 }
 
+static inline bool arch_pkey_access_rights_valid(unsigned long rights)
+{
+       return false;
+}
+
 #endif /* ! CONFIG_ARCH_HAS_PKEYS */
 
 #endif /* _LINUX_PKEYS_H */
diff --git a/mm/mprotect.c b/mm/mprotect.c
index 6d331620b9e5..f4cefc3540df 100644
--- a/mm/mprotect.c
+++ b/mm/mprotect.c
@@ -597,7 +597,7 @@ SYSCALL_DEFINE2(pkey_alloc, unsigned long, flags, unsigned 
long, init_val)
        if (flags)
                return -EINVAL;
        /* check for unsupported init values */
-       if (init_val & ~PKEY_ACCESS_MASK)
+       if (!arch_pkey_access_rights_valid(init_val))
                return -EINVAL;
 
        down_write(&current->mm->mmap_sem);

Thanks,
Florian

Reply via email to