For drivers that do not support context exclusion we do not
advertise the PERF_PMU_CAP_EXCLUDE capability. This ensures
that perf will prevent us from handling events where any exclusion
flags are set. Let's remove the now unnecessary check for
exclusion flags.

Signed-off-by: Andrew Murray <andrew.mur...@arm.com>
---
 drivers/perf/arm-cci.c                   | 9 ---------
 drivers/perf/arm-ccn.c                   | 5 +----
 drivers/perf/arm_dsu_pmu.c               | 8 +-------
 drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_uncore_pmu.c | 9 ---------
 4 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-)

diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm-cci.c b/drivers/perf/arm-cci.c
index 1bfeb16..501b497 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm-cci.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm-cci.c
@@ -1327,15 +1327,6 @@ static int cci_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
        if (is_sampling_event(event) || event->attach_state & PERF_ATTACH_TASK)
                return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
-       /* We have no filtering of any kind */
-       if (event->attr.exclude_user    ||
-           event->attr.exclude_kernel  ||
-           event->attr.exclude_hv      ||
-           event->attr.exclude_idle    ||
-           event->attr.exclude_host    ||
-           event->attr.exclude_guest)
-               return -EINVAL;
-
        /*
         * Following the example set by other "uncore" PMUs, we accept any CPU
         * and rewrite its affinity dynamically rather than having perf core
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm-ccn.c b/drivers/perf/arm-ccn.c
index 7dd850e..decf881 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm-ccn.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm-ccn.c
@@ -741,10 +741,7 @@ static int arm_ccn_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
                return -EOPNOTSUPP;
        }
 
-       if (has_branch_stack(event) || event->attr.exclude_user ||
-                       event->attr.exclude_kernel || event->attr.exclude_hv ||
-                       event->attr.exclude_idle || event->attr.exclude_host ||
-                       event->attr.exclude_guest) {
+       if (has_branch_stack(event)) {
                dev_dbg(ccn->dev, "Can't exclude execution levels!\n");
                return -EINVAL;
        }
diff --git a/drivers/perf/arm_dsu_pmu.c b/drivers/perf/arm_dsu_pmu.c
index 660cb8a..036414c 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/arm_dsu_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/arm_dsu_pmu.c
@@ -562,13 +562,7 @@ static int dsu_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
                return -EINVAL;
        }
 
-       if (has_branch_stack(event) ||
-           event->attr.exclude_user ||
-           event->attr.exclude_kernel ||
-           event->attr.exclude_hv ||
-           event->attr.exclude_idle ||
-           event->attr.exclude_host ||
-           event->attr.exclude_guest) {
+       if (has_branch_stack(event)) {
                dev_dbg(dsu_pmu->pmu.dev, "Can't support filtering\n");
                return -EINVAL;
        }
diff --git a/drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_uncore_pmu.c 
b/drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_uncore_pmu.c
index 9efd241..f028cbc 100644
--- a/drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_uncore_pmu.c
+++ b/drivers/perf/hisilicon/hisi_uncore_pmu.c
@@ -142,15 +142,6 @@ int hisi_uncore_pmu_event_init(struct perf_event *event)
        if (is_sampling_event(event) || event->attach_state & PERF_ATTACH_TASK)
                return -EOPNOTSUPP;
 
-       /* counters do not have these bits */
-       if (event->attr.exclude_user    ||
-           event->attr.exclude_kernel  ||
-           event->attr.exclude_host    ||
-           event->attr.exclude_guest   ||
-           event->attr.exclude_hv      ||
-           event->attr.exclude_idle)
-               return -EINVAL;
-
        /*
         *  The uncore counters not specific to any CPU, so cannot
         *  support per-task
-- 
2.7.4

Reply via email to