> This isn't a problem with this device tree, but it's probably time we > started establishing some conventional generic names for nand flash > and board-control devices. > > So, to start the ball rolling, I've seen several names for nand flash > nodes, I'd suggest we standardise on "nand-flash".
What's wrong with the already well-established generic name "flash"? > I've seen several variants for board control devices (cpld, bcsr, > fpga, etc.) I suggest we standardise on "board-control" Fine with me, but it's very vague (hard to avoid though). Segher _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
