Satheesh Rajendran <sathn...@linux.vnet.ibm.com> writes: > On Thu, Nov 08, 2018 at 04:23:07PM -0200, Breno Leitao wrote: >> hi Satheesh, >> >> On 11/08/2018 03:08 AM, sathn...@linux.vnet.ibm.com wrote: >> > --- /dev/null >> > +++ b/arch/powerpc/configs/guest.config >> > @@ -0,0 +1,14 @@ >> > +CONFIG_VIRTIO_BLK=y >> > +CONFIG_VIRTIO_BLK_SCSI=y >> > +CONFIG_SCSI_VIRTIO=y >> > +CONFIG_VIRTIO_NET=y >> > +CONFIG_NET_FAILOVER=y >> > +CONFIG_VIRTIO_CONSOLE=y >> > +CONFIG_VIRTIO=y >> > +CONFIG_VIRTIO_PCI=y >> > +CONFIG_KVM_GUEST=y >> > +CONFIG_EPAPR_PARAVIRT=y >> > +CONFIG_XFS_FS=y >> >> Why a guest kernel needs to have XFS integrated in the core image? I am >> wondering if it is a requirement from another CONFIG_ option. > > Idea is to have a working config which would boot guest without initramfs, > other FS(like EXT4) is already integrated in the core image, > thought this would be helpful for distributions, which default XFS as root > disk.
Maybe we should switch XFS_FS to Y in ppc64_defconfig ? cheers
