-----Original Message----- From: Poonam Aggrwal Sent: 2018年10月29日 19:09 To: Vabhav Sharma <vabhav.sha...@nxp.com>; sudeep.ho...@arm.com; o...@buserror.net; linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; devicet...@vger.kernel.org; robh...@kernel.org; mark.rutl...@arm.com; linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; mturque...@baylibre.com; sb...@kernel.org; r...@rjwysocki.net; viresh.ku...@linaro.org; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; linux...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel-ow...@vger.kernel.org; catalin.mari...@arm.com; will.dea...@arm.com; gre...@linuxfoundation.org; a...@arndb.de; kstew...@linuxfoundation.org; yamada.masah...@socionext.com; Leo Li <leoyang...@nxp.com>; shawn...@kernel.org Cc: ulf.hans...@linaro.org; Udit Kumar <udit.ku...@nxp.com>; Pankaj Bansal <pankaj.ban...@nxp.com>; li...@armlinux.org.uk; adrian.hun...@intel.com; Varun Sethi <v.se...@nxp.com>; Vabhav Sharma <vabhav.sha...@nxp.com>; Yinbo Zhu <yinbo....@nxp.com> Subject: RE: [PATCH v7 2/6] soc/fsl/guts: Add definition for LX2160A
> -----Original Message----- > From: linux-arm-kernel > [mailto:linux-arm-kernel-boun...@lists.infradead.org] > On Behalf Of Vabhav Sharma > Sent: Monday, October 29, 2018 2:28 PM > To: sudeep.ho...@arm.com; o...@buserror.net; > linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org; devicet...@vger.kernel.org; > robh...@kernel.org; mark.rutl...@arm.com; > linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org; linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org; > mturque...@baylibre.com; sb...@kernel.org; r...@rjwysocki.net; > viresh.ku...@linaro.org; linux-...@vger.kernel.org; > linux...@vger.kernel.org; linux-kernel-ow...@vger.kernel.org; > catalin.mari...@arm.com; will.dea...@arm.com; > gre...@linuxfoundation.org; a...@arndb.de; > kstew...@linuxfoundation.org; yamada.masah...@socionext.com; Leo Li > <leoyang...@nxp.com>; shawn...@kernel.org > Cc: ulf.hans...@linaro.org; Udit Kumar <udit.ku...@nxp.com>; Pankaj > Bansal <pankaj.ban...@nxp.com>; li...@armlinux.org.uk; > adrian.hun...@intel.com; Varun Sethi <v.se...@nxp.com>; Vabhav Sharma > <vabhav.sha...@nxp.com>; Yinbo Zhu <yinbo....@nxp.com> > Subject: [PATCH v7 2/6] soc/fsl/guts: Add definition for LX2160A > > Adding compatible string "lx2160a-dcfg" to initialize guts driver for > lx2160 and SoC die attribute definition for LX2160A > > Signed-off-by: Vabhav Sharma <vabhav.sha...@nxp.com> > Signed-off-by: Yinbo Zhu <yinbo....@nxp.com> > Acked-by: Li Yang <leoyang...@nxp.com> > --- > drivers/soc/fsl/guts.c | 6 ++++++ > 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+) > > diff --git a/drivers/soc/fsl/guts.c b/drivers/soc/fsl/guts.c index > 302e0c8..bcab1ee 100644 > --- a/drivers/soc/fsl/guts.c > +++ b/drivers/soc/fsl/guts.c > @@ -100,6 +100,11 @@ static const struct fsl_soc_die_attr fsl_soc_die[] = { > .svr = 0x87000000, > .mask = 0xfff70000, > }, > + /* Die: LX2160A, SoC: LX2160A/LX2120A/LX2080A */ > + { .die = "LX2160A", > + .svr = 0x87360000, >Do all the threevariants " LX2160A/LX2120A/LX2080A" have same SVR? Dear Poonam Aggrwal, No, but the threevariants " LX2160A/LX2120A/LX2080A" has same svr value in this struct, Because they all are variants of lx2160, the svr value in this struct is equal the soc svr && mask Best Regards, Yinbo Zhu. > + .mask = 0xff3f0000, > + }, > { }, > }; > > @@ -222,6 +227,7 @@ static const struct of_device_id fsl_guts_of_match[] = { > { .compatible = "fsl,ls1088a-dcfg", }, > { .compatible = "fsl,ls1012a-dcfg", }, > { .compatible = "fsl,ls1046a-dcfg", }, > + { .compatible = "fsl,lx2160a-dcfg", }, > {} > }; > MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(of, fsl_guts_of_match); > -- > 2.7.4 > > > _______________________________________________ > linux-arm-kernel mailing list > linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org > https://emea01.safelinks.protection.outlook.com/?url=http%3A%2F%2Flist > s.infr > adead.org%2Fmailman%2Flistinfo%2Flinux-arm- > kernel&data=02%7C01%7Cpoonam.aggrwal%40nxp.com%7Cd9b7c36c786 > 54cd6dc4008d63d7fee63%7C686ea1d3bc2b4c6fa92cd99c5c301635%7C0%7C0 > %7C636764017001504288&sdata=pqFMlw6yVrHrvn4YRhqj%2FmoOnSscrZu > tcoYn3In8OJc%3D&reserved=0
