Benjamin Herrenschmidt writes: > Do we have any indication that it performs better than the C one ?
I would expect it to, given that the assembler one has two branches in the per-byte loop compared to 3 in the C version. Paul. _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev