Benjamin Herrenschmidt writes:

> Do we have any indication that it performs better than the C one ?

I would expect it to, given that the assembler one has two branches in
the per-byte loop compared to 3 in the C version.

Paul.
_______________________________________________
Linuxppc-dev mailing list
Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org
https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev

Reply via email to