Le 03/10/2018 à 09:46, Alexey Kardashevskiy a écrit :


On 28/09/2018 22:46, Michael Ellerman wrote:
Alexey Kardashevskiy <a...@ozlabs.ru> writes:
The included opal.h gives a wrong idea that CXL makes PPC OPAL calls
while it does not so let's remote it.

But it does use eg.

   OPAL_PHB_CAPI_MODE_SNOOP_ON
   OPAL_PHB_CAPI_MODE_CAPI

Which come from opal-api.h via opal.h.

So you should at least include opal-api.h.


I'd say that since it includes pnv-pci.h (and this is why this patch
compiles), it should be a different set of values for powernv (which
would map 1:1 to OPAL_PHB_xxx). The powernv platform knowledge is
already intimate enough for a driver to have. Dunno, I found this opal.h
inclusion confusing, that's all.


I agree, it would be the cleaner way of doing it. It's going to be pretty low on my list though...

  Fred





cheers

diff --git a/drivers/misc/cxl/pci.c b/drivers/misc/cxl/pci.c
index b66d832..8cbcbb7 100644
--- a/drivers/misc/cxl/pci.c
+++ b/drivers/misc/cxl/pci.c
@@ -17,7 +17,6 @@
  #include <linux/pci.h>
  #include <linux/of.h>
  #include <linux/delay.h>
-#include <asm/opal.h>
  #include <asm/msi_bitmap.h>
  #include <asm/pnv-pci.h>
  #include <asm/io.h>
--
2.11.0


Reply via email to