> -----Original Message----- > From: Li Yang [mailto:leoyang...@nxp.com] > Sent: Tuesday, October 2, 2018 1:30 AM > To: Madalin-cristian Bucur <madalin.bu...@nxp.com> > Cc: Roy Pledge <roy.ple...@nxp.com>; Claudiu Manoil > <claudiu.man...@nxp.com>; Catalin Marinas <catalin.mari...@arm.com>; Scott > Wood <o...@buserror.net>; moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM > ARCHITECTURE <linux-arm-ker...@lists.infradead.org>; linuxppc-dev > <linuxppc-dev@lists.ozlabs.org>; lkml <linux-ker...@vger.kernel.org> > Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 0/5] soc/fsl/qbman: DPAA QBMan fixes and additions > > On Fri, Sep 28, 2018 at 3:44 AM Madalin Bucur <madalin.bu...@nxp.com> > wrote: > > > > Applied 1-4 to for-next while waiting for clarification on 5/5. And > updated the prefix to "soc: fsl:" style to be aligned with arm-soc > convention. Please try to use that style in the future for soc/fsl > patches.
Thank you, I've sent an email about the APIs. I'm not sure we need to align the prefix to arm-soc as the soc/fsl does not service only ARM but also PPC based SoCs and historically we've been using the soc/* format. Regards, Madalin
