On 09/21/2018 05:37 AM, YueHaibing wrote:
> find_aa_index will return -1 when dlpar_clone_property fails,
> its return value type should be int. Also the caller
> update_lmb_associativity_index should use a int variable to
> get it,then compared with 0.
The aa_index that we are handling here is defined as an unsigned value
in the PAPR so I'm a little hesitant in changing it to a signed value.
Also, changing the aa_index to be signed, we still assign it to the
u32 lmb->aa_index.
There are some other places where the aa_index is treated as a signed value
in finc_aa_index(). Perhaps the better solution is use an rc value to track
the validation of finding the aa_index instead of the aa_index value itself.
-Nathan
>
> Fixes: c05a5a40969e ("powerpc/pseries: Dynamic add entires to associativity
> lookup array")
> Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaib...@huawei.com>
> ---
> arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c | 7 +++----
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
> b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
> index 9a15d39..6aad17c 100644
> --- a/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
> +++ b/arch/powerpc/platforms/pseries/hotplug-memory.c
> @@ -101,13 +101,12 @@ static struct property *dlpar_clone_property(struct
> property *prop,
> return new_prop;
> }
>
> -static u32 find_aa_index(struct device_node *dr_node,
> +static int find_aa_index(struct device_node *dr_node,
> struct property *ala_prop, const u32 *lmb_assoc)
> {
> u32 *assoc_arrays;
> - u32 aa_index;
> int aa_arrays, aa_array_entries, aa_array_sz;
> - int i, index;
> + int i, index, aa_index;
>
> /*
> * The ibm,associativity-lookup-arrays property is defined to be
> @@ -168,7 +167,7 @@ static int update_lmb_associativity_index(struct
> drmem_lmb *lmb)
> struct device_node *parent, *lmb_node, *dr_node;
> struct property *ala_prop;
> const u32 *lmb_assoc;
> - u32 aa_index;
> + int aa_index;
>
> parent = of_find_node_by_path("/");
> if (!parent)
>
