On Sat, 15 Sep 2018 at 01:03, Nicholas Piggin <npig...@gmail.com> wrote: > > This causes SLB alloation to start 1 beyond the start of the SLB. > There is no real problem because after it wraps it stats behaving
starts? > properly, it's just surprisig to see when looking at SLB traces. surprising > > Signed-off-by: Nicholas Piggin <npig...@gmail.com> > --- > arch/powerpc/mm/slb.c | 2 +- > 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) > > diff --git a/arch/powerpc/mm/slb.c b/arch/powerpc/mm/slb.c > index 9f574e59d178..2f162c6e52d4 100644 > --- a/arch/powerpc/mm/slb.c > +++ b/arch/powerpc/mm/slb.c > @@ -355,7 +355,7 @@ void slb_initialize(void) > #endif > } > > - get_paca()->stab_rr = SLB_NUM_BOLTED; > + get_paca()->stab_rr = SLB_NUM_BOLTED - 1; > > lflags = SLB_VSID_KERNEL | linear_llp; > vflags = SLB_VSID_KERNEL | vmalloc_llp; > -- > 2.18.0 >
