On Thu, 28 Feb 2008 10:00:00 +1100 Paul Mackerras <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Josh Boyer writes: > > > I'm trying to find some patches that went to the list recently in > > patchwork and they seem to be missing. Here are a few: > > > > http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2008-February/052196.html > > That one was in "awaiting upstream" state since I put it in the > bundle, then realized it should probably go through your tree, and > didn't apply it. I've put it back to "new" state now. Ok. Not sure why I couldn't find it under the "All" state earlier. I see it now. > > http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2008-February/052164.html > > I seem to recall putting that one in "changes requested" state, but > now I can't find it either. Strange... "changes requested" is what I was expecting, but didn't see it. Strange indeed. > > http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2008-February/052129.html > > Not sure where that one has gone. It's not overly important, since it was whitespace corrupted and I have a fixed version anyway. But it's still odd it's not on patchwork. > > http://ozlabs.org/pipermail/linuxppc-dev/2008-February/052050.html > > I have been deleting patches that go through other maintainers to try > to keep the number of patches down to a manageable level, and that > includes ibm_newemac patches, since they go through Jeff Garzik. > That's probably what happened to this one. I'll leave ibm_newemac > patches alone if you promise to clean them up periodically. :) Oh, I didn't realize you could actually outright delete them. I tend to look after ibm_newemac because it's mostly related to 4xx and I get to bug BenH to do the jgarzik bugging because he said he wants to be the maintainer. I have no problems cleaning them up. josh _______________________________________________ Linuxppc-dev mailing list Linuxppc-dev@ozlabs.org https://ozlabs.org/mailman/listinfo/linuxppc-dev
