Hi Michael,

On 07/26/2018 09:24 AM, Michael Ellerman wrote:
These tests are currently failing on (some) big endian systems. Until
we can fix that, skip them unless we're on ppc64le.

I can take a look at this.

Is that the same issue related to the gcc version we discussed a month ago?
If not, could you provide the crash logs as a starting point?
Thanks,
Gustavo

Signed-off-by: Michael Ellerman <m...@ellerman.id.au>
---
  tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm-sigreturn.c | 1 +
  tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm-tar.c       | 1 +
  tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm-vmxcopy.c   | 1 +
  3 files changed, 3 insertions(+)

diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm-sigreturn.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm-sigreturn.c
index 85d63449243b..9a6017a1d769 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm-sigreturn.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm-sigreturn.c
@@ -55,6 +55,7 @@ int tm_sigreturn(void)
        uint64_t ret = 0;

        SKIP_IF(!have_htm());
+       SKIP_IF(!is_ppc64le());

        memset(&sa, 0, sizeof(sa));
        sa.sa_handler = handler;
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm-tar.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm-tar.c
index 2d2fcc2b7a60..f31fe5a28ddb 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm-tar.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm-tar.c
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ int test_tar(void)
        int i;

        SKIP_IF(!have_htm());
+       SKIP_IF(!is_ppc64le());

        for (i = 0; i < num_loops; i++)
        {
diff --git a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm-vmxcopy.c 
b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm-vmxcopy.c
index 0274de7b11f3..fe52811584ae 100644
--- a/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm-vmxcopy.c
+++ b/tools/testing/selftests/powerpc/tm/tm-vmxcopy.c
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@ int test_vmxcopy()
        uint64_t aborted = 0;

        SKIP_IF(!have_htm());
+       SKIP_IF(!is_ppc64le());

        fd = mkstemp(tmpfile);
        assert(fd >= 0);


Reply via email to